crazy man

Okay, I don't usually post things that I find absurd, but this deserves some thought.
The Citizen Scientist
This is a story about a guy who wants to eliminate 90% of the world's population. That's just shy of 5.4 or so billion people. I think the reporter is right; there's something wrong with this guy and the people who applaud him in the efforts. The Ebola virus idea is what really bugs me.
Dr. Pianka apparently believes the airborn version of this could be used "properly" to help save the world.
Now, if this supposedly for the benefit of mankind, why the hell (normally, I wouldn't say that) would some idiot put his efforts into this and not some other form of work to save mankind. I guess going to the moon and establishing colonies is out of the question. We're talking about a guy who put all he time and energy into the destruction of the world in an attempt to save it. This isn't moral; it's stupid and idiotic. If Pianka did it for attention, why in the world did he not give a disclaimer or something at the end?
There's a fine line between distinguished thought and erronous ways.
This doctor surely could have spent his time a bit better and worked on actually saving people instead of killing them off. There are other options available to us. If we are actually destroying the world, then perhaps we can work on saving that which we are wasting. Or, we could move on. That's just as radical of an approach as mass extermination. If you're going to focus on something, do it right. Pianka sure gave it his all though. Sure did.
Does this not remind you of anything? Say, GENOCIDE?
Moron. This guy is a moron, despite what his dissertation says. Remember the discussion on salute the title, not the man? Well, here we go. NEITHER!
I need a drink.